Types of Mythology Worksheet Essay - 1013 Words

University of Phoenix Material Types of Myths Worksheet Knowledge, Belief, Myth, and Religion Directions: Answer the following question on knowledge, belief, myth, and religion in 3 to 5 sentences. How are knowledge, belief, myth, and religion related to one another and how are they distinct from one another? Use an example from your life or popular culture to explain this relationship. Knowledge is made up of facts, truth, stories, and more. Belief is â€Å"the assertion that something is true without necessary proof, evidence or facts to back it up.† Myth is a fictional story, tends to have a hero or event to justify a social preamble. Religion is a combination of beliefs, and myths that helps draw attention of followers.†¦show more content†¦24). This means it allows us to find truths about how people behaved in any stories. How have these pieces of literature helped society to understand the universe? It helped society understand the universe because it helps us see things differently and figure out what is not perfect and what is perfect because according to Powell, â€Å"the material world in which we live, reported to us by our senses, is nonetheless to some extent modeled after the perfect rational world† (Powell, 2002, p. 23) Medieval and Renaissance Myths Myth 1: Song of Solomon Literature it’s found in: The Bible Myth 2: Three sisters representing 4 stages of intoxication – too much wine, the forgetfulness it causes, lust and sheer madness. Literature it’s found in: Story of Liber of Mythologies of Fulgentius (Powell, 2002). Answer the following questions: Describe medieval and Renaissance myths. It is used heavily in classical mythology because in retrospect, there are morals in any classical (traditional) stories but was used in mythological stories. A good example of this would be the bible, according to Powell who wrote, â€Å"the allegorical method whereby moral meanings were drawn from old stories was also applied extensively to the Bible† (Powell, 2002, p. 24). How have these pieces ofShow MoreRelatedSituational Analysis: 7th Grade Language Arts6569 Words   |  26 Pagesdescribing their beliefs and the roots of where it got started Title of Course and Justification One very interesting aspect of the human experience is the manner in which certain themes appear again and again over time, in literature, religion, mythology, and culture regardless of the geographic location, the economic status, and the time period. Perhaps it is the innate human need to explain and explore the known and unknown, but to have disparate cultures in time and location find ways of explainingRead MoreCoffee and Crisis Management Team21317 Words   |  86 PagesVulnerabilities Potential Crisis Impact Chart Incident Report Forms†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..........†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..19 Proprietary Information†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..........†¦....23 Media Press Kit†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢ € ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..................24 Communication Strategy Worksheet†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦....†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..........†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...26 Stakeholder Contact Information†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.........†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦......28 Business Continuity Plan†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.........†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..32 Crisis Control Center Information†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.........33 Post Crisis

Essay on Chaucer Satire And Humor - 2661 Words

Chaucer: Satire And Humor Until Geoffrey Chaucer wrote the Canterbury Tales, he was primarily know for being the writer of love poems, such as The Parliament of Fowls, narratives of doomed passion, and stories of women wronged by their lovers. These works are nothing short of being breath taking, but they do not posses the raw power that the Canterbury Tales do. This unfinished poem, which is about 17,000 lines, is one of the most brilliant works in all of literature. The poem introduces a group of pilgrims journeying from London to the shrine of St. Thomas a Becket at Canterbury. Together, the pilgrims represent a large section of 14th-century English life. To help pass the time of the journey, the pilgrims decide to tell†¦show more content†¦The Prologue begins with the Knight. In Chaucer’s description of the Knight, he describes him as being the perfect being. He’s tall, handsome, brave, and he has won many battles. He has traveled to many places because Chaucer tells us that he has fought in Prussia, Lithuania, Russia, Spain, North Africa, and Turkey (Chaucer 3). However, even though Chaucer describes the Knight as being the perfect being, he begins to poke fun at him. He insists that the Knight was â€Å"a very gentle knight.† This is very strange because Chaucer thinks the Knight to be the ideal warrior, yet he believes him to be gentle (Brown 6). This is a very humorous contrast, and it adds a little mystery to the Knight’s description. The next character in the story is the Squire. The Squire is the son of the Knight, and he is described as being very young and handsome. Many people read the Squire’s description and think him to be a â€Å"to die for† young man. However, when you analyze the text closely, Chaucer adds some feminine and childlike traits to the Squire’s description. It is said that the Squire has long curly hair, is full of flowers, and he wears a very short gown. He likes to sit around and just stare at the sky, and he also likes to sit and play the flute (Chaucer 4). I believe that Chaucer is trying to portray the Squire as being very confused, and even though he may have a lot to offer the world, he still has toShow MoreRelated Chivalry in Chaucers Canterbury Tales802 Words   |  4 PagesChivalry in Chaucers Canterbury Tales In his Canterbury Tales, Chaucer fully explicates the cultural standard known as curteisye through satire. In the fourteenth century curteisye embodied sophistication and an education in French international culture. The legends of chilvalric knights, conversing in the language of courtly love, matured during this later medieval period. Chaucer himself matured in the Kings Court, and he reveled in his cultural status, but he also retained an anecdotalRead MoreThe Use Of Satire In The Canterbury Tales By Geoffrey Chaucer1406 Words   |  6 PagesGeoffrey Chaucer wrote The Canterbury Tales, using his characters as the mouthpiece for his iconoclastic views. Chaucer had serious issues with the hypocrisy of the church as well as, many other sacred institutions. The only reason that Chaucer was not exiled or even imprisoned for his views is the way in which he exposed them. Through the allegorical meanings of this text and Chaucer’s claim that he is simply retelling the e vents of his pilgrimage to Canterbury as it occurred, Chaucer is saved fromRead MoreUse Of Satire In Canterbury Tales1301 Words   |  6 PagesChaucer’s Satyric Attack (An analysis of Chaucer’s use of satire to reach his intended audience in his Canterbury Tales) Satire is defined as â€Å"the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize peoples stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues† (Oxford). Another term that people would be more familiar with to describe this would be sarcasm. Language can be utilized in a nasty way, especially when wanting to demoralizeRead MoreHumor Or A Is It All Just Common Anti-Feminist Stereotype1152 Words   |  5 Pages Humor or a is it all just common anti-feminist stereotype; Geoffrey Chaucer explores thought out the Canterbury tales- The Wife of Bath. The Canterbury tales is a group of 28 people that went on a pilgrim. Each telling their own stories (including Chaucer himself). Of all the people on the pilgrim, there were only two women. The first was the Prioress in which Chaucer explains to be the head of the nunnery; she was kind hearted (including to animals). The other woman was the Wife of Bath (whomRead MoreEssay on Satire in Canterbury Tales1020 Words   |  5 PagesThe aim of any true satirical work is to poke fun at a certain aspect of society, while also inspiring reform to that very same aspect in one way or another. In Chaucers Canterbury Tales, Chaucer satirizes the Medieval Church and those associated with the church. Medieval society was centered largely around the Church. Ideally, the people were expected to understand that earthly possessions were meaningless when compared to the prospect of closeness with God. Man was expected to work until he diedRead MoreMonty Python and the Holy Grail Essay1672 Words   |  7 Pagescomedy, a satire and a parody. In contemporary usage, a parody is a work that imitates another work in order to; ridicule, ironically comment on, or poke fun at the work itself; the subject of the work, the author or fictional voice of the parody, or another subject. Satire on the other hand is usually witty, and often very funny, although the primary p urpose of satire is not humor but criticism of an individual or a group in a witty manner. There are many examples of parody and Satire throughoutRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s The Crucible 1294 Words   |  6 Pagesrelationship Emily would have with one of them. Chaucer devotes two pages to their argument on who deserves Emily more, Arcite who loves towards her is a â€Å"love as to a creature† or Palamon whose love Arcite mocks as an â€Å"affeccioun of hoolynesse †. It is this lack of agency and the different affections that Chaucer subverts in the Miller’s tale. Nicholas and Absolon do not suffer like Palamon or Arcite. Both actively pursue and woo Alison. What Chaucer subverts here is the effectiveness of romanticRead MoreThe Canterbury Tales By Geoffrey Chaucer1321 Words   |  6 Pagesbehind The Canterbury Tales is enhancing. Geoffrey Chaucer was a revolutionary writer whose life influenced his writing. Geoffrey Chaucer helped the king and stayed at his service for years. Chaucer quit the service to chase his ambitious dream of being a writer and a poet, and hoped to succeed. Chaucer wrote many stories and poems and his most successful and popular was The Canterbury Tales. His stories were revolutionary and successful. Geoffrey Chaucer s life was not always good, he was originallyRead MoreThe Canterbury Tales By Geoffrey Chaucer1777 Words   |  8 PagesGeoffrey Chaucer, the author of these stories does something most authors didn’t do at this time, he ironically pointed out the flaws of the medieval English society. He does thi s by using estate satire. The Canterbury Tales is a great example of the British human experience at that point in time. Chaucer does a great job describing each character, almost painting a picture in your head, giving you a clear image of the three estates model, and the corruption that takes place throughout. Chaucer conveysRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Gulliver s Travels Essay1942 Words   |  8 Pages In his book, Gulliver’s Travels, it is hard to miss the various references that its author, Johnathan Swift, makes concerning bodily functions. Yet, this is more than the bawdy, juvenile toilet humor one would encounter in a cheeky T.V. show for it has a literary purpose. Scatology is used to define the literary trope of the grotesque body. Through the realist perspective, Swift employs scatology to both shock and attract. He uses it to draw attention to Gulliver’s humanity, and normalize the strangeness

Peer and Self Assessment Free Essays

Assessing Learning Peer and Self Assessment Peer Assessment One of the ways in which students internalize the characteristics of quality work is by evaluating the work of their peers. However, if they are to offer helpful feedback, students must have a clear understanding of what they are to look for in their peers’ work. The instructor must explain expectations clearly to them before they begin. We will write a custom essay sample on Peer and Self Assessment or any similar topic only for you Order Now One way to make sure students understand this type of evaluation is to give students a practice session with it. The instructor provides a sample writing or speaking assignment. As a group, students determine what should be assessed and how criteria for successful completion of the communication task should be defined. Then the instructor gives students a sample completed assignment. Students assess this using the criteria they have developed, and determine how to convey feedback clearly to the fictitious student. Students can also benefit from using rubrics or checklists to guide their assessments. At first these can be provided by the instructor; once the students have more experience, they can develop them themselves. An example of a peer editing checklist for a writing assignment is given in the popup window. Notice that the checklist asks the peer evaluator to comment primarily on the content and organization of the essay. It helps the peer evaluator focus on these areas by asking questions about specific points, such as the presence of examples to support the ideas discussed. For peer evaluation to work effectively, the learning environment in the classroom must be supportive. Students must feel comfortable and trust one another in order to provide honest and constructive feedback. Instructors who use group work and peer assessment frequently can help students develop trust by forming them into small groups early in the semester and having them work in the same groups throughout the term. This allows them to become more comfortable with each other and leads to better peer feedback. Self Assessment Students can become better language learners when they engage in deliberate thought about what they are learning and how they are learning it. In this kind of reflection, students step back from the learning process to think about their language learning strategies and their progress as language earners. Such self assessment encourages students to become independent learners and can increase their motivation. The successful use of student self assessment depends on three key elements:  ·Goal setting  ·Guided practice with assessment tools  ·Portfolios Goal setting Goal setting is essential because students can evaluate their progress more clearly when they have targets against which to measure their performance. In addition, students’ motivation to learn increases when they have self-defined, and therefore relevant, learning goals. At first, students tend to create lofty long-range goals (â€Å"to speak Russian)† that do not lend themselves to self assessment. To help students develop realistic, short-term, attainable goals, instructors can use a framework like SMART goals outline shown in the popup window. One way to begin the process of introducing students to self-assessment is to create student-teacher contracts. Contracts are written agreements between students and instructors, which commonly involve determining the number and type of assignments that are required for particular grades. For example, a student may agree to work toward the grade of â€Å"B† by completing a specific number of assignments at a level of quality described by the instructor. Contracts can serve as a good way of helping students to begin to consider establishing goals for themselves as language learners. Guided practice with assessment tools Students do not learn to monitor or assess their learning on their own; they need to be taught strategies for self monitoring and self assessment. Techniques for teaching students these strategies are parallel to those used for teaching learning strategies (see Motivating Learners[-0]). The instructor models the technique (use of a checklist or rubric, for example); students then try the technique themselves; finally, students discuss whether and how well the technique worked and what to do differently next time. In addition to checklists and rubrics for specific communication tasks, students can also use broader self-assessment tools to reflect on topics they have studied, skills they have learned, their study habits, and heir sense of their overall strengths and weaknesses. An example of such a tool appears in the popup window. Students can share their self-assessments with a peer or in a small group, with instructions that they compare their impressions with other criteria such as test scores, teacher evaluations, and peers’ opinions. This kind of practice helps students to be aware of their learning. It also informs the teacher about students’ thoughts on their progress, and gives the teacher feedback about course content and instruction. Portfolios Portfolios are purposeful, organized, systematic collections of student work that tell the story of a student’s efforts, progress, and achievement in specific areas. The student participates in the selection of portfolio content, the development of guidelines for selection, and the definition of criteria for judging merit. Portfolio assessment is a joint process for instructor and student. Portfolio assessment emphasizes evaluation of students’ progress, processes, and performance over time. There are two basic types of portfolios:  ·A process portfolio serves the purpose of classroom-level assessment on the part of both the instructor and the student. It most often reflects formative assessment, although it may be assigned a grade at the end of the semester or academic year. It may also include summative types of assignments that were awarded grades.  ·A product portfolio is more summative in nature. It is intended for a major evaluation of some sort and is often accompanied by an oral presentation of its contents. For example, it may be used as a evaluation tool for graduation from a program or for the purpose of seeking employment. In both types of portfolios, emphasis is placed on including a variety of tasks that elicit spontaneous as well as planned language performance for a variety of purposes and audiences, using rubrics to assess performance, and demonstrating reflection about learning, including goal setting and self and peer assessment. Portfolio characteristics:  ·Represent an emphasis on language use and cultural understanding  ·Represent a collaborative approach to assessment Represent a student’s range of performance in reading, writing, speaking, and listening as well as cultural understanding  ·Emphasize what students can do rather than what they cannot do  ·Represent a student’s progress over time  ·Engage students in establishing ongoing learning goals and assessing their progress towards those goals  ·Measure each student’s achievement while allowing for individual differences between students in a class  ·Address improvement, effort, and achievement  ·Allow for assessment of process and product  ·Link teaching and assessment to learning [-;0] – http://www. nclrc. org/essentials/motivating/moindex. htm How to cite Peer and Self Assessment, Papers

Human Research Ethics

Question: Discuss about theHuman Research Ethics. Answer: The Historical Aspects and Infuence of Three Documents: The Nuremberg Code: According to Nuremberg Code, the voluntary permission of the human subjects is essential to progress the particular process in an effective manner. It indicates that the person participating in the process should have the legal capacity for giving the permission. As per the particular code, the human subjects must have the adequate knowledge on the nature, duration and the purpose of the experiments (Dhai, 2014). Moreover, the effect of the research should not affect the health of the human subject. According to the code, the experiment should be beneficial for the society and the research should not be random in nature. During the mid-century, the participants had to face challenges for undergoing the treatment process, as they might face physical trouble due to the adverse clinical effects. On the contrary, according to the Nuremberg code, the experiment must be conducted through following a particular set of processes so that it could not make any unnecessary physical and mental s uffering and injury (Monroe et al., 2013). This particular guideline has facilitated in enhancing the clinical trial process in the present days, and it has contributed to shaping up the process for engaging the research on the human subjects. Moreover, the experiment conducted in present days is executed under the supervision of scientifically qualified persons. Similarly, clinical trial process has also been described in the Nuremberg code. The Declaration of Helsinki: The declaration of Helsinki suggests the set of ethical principles on the human experimentation developed by the World Medical Association (World Medical Association., 2013). It has been developed for the medical community, and it is regarded as one of the prime document on the human research ethics. According to the particular law, the duty of the physicians is to promote and safeguard the health of the patients. Moreover, the physicians are responsible for protecting those who are involved in the medical research process. Physicians need to consider the ethical, legal and regulatory rules and regulations for the investigation involving the human subjects. The prime duty of the physicians participating in the medical research is to safeguard the life, health, dignity, privacy, integrity, confidentiality of personal information of the investigating subjects (Millum, Wendler Emanuel, 2013). In the present days, these factors are considered into the other field of human research ethic s apart from the medical sector. For instance, without upholding the dignity into the process, the researcher would not be able to obtain enhanced outcome out of it. On the other hand, the medical research involving the human subjects needs to be followed by the scientific principles and the researcher mush have painstaking knowledge of the relevant sources of information and other scientific literature. Without upholding the modern and scientific process, the researcher investigating on the human subjects would not be able to obtain a beneficial outcome. According to the Declaration of Helsinki, human subjects must have the proper scientific training and qualifications so that the research can be executed in an efficient manner (Adams Miles, 2013). Likewise, in the modern day, the researcher involves the trained human subjects into the research process for obtaining high value in the research. The Belmont Report: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research created the Belmont Report. The particular report is first issued on 30th September 1978, and it was published in the Federal Register on 18th April 1979 (Brakewood Poldrack, 2013). The particular legislation indicates the unifying ethical principles, which develops the basis for the National commissions topic-specific reports. According to the Belmont Report, there are three fundamental ethical principles to utilize the human subjects for investigation. Three fundamentals are respect for the person, beneficence and justice (Sieber Tolich, 2012). The researcher needs to treat the human subjects with proper courtesy, and the human subject needs to be respected in an efficient manner. Besides this, the human subjects should not face any harm during the process. Lastly, the human subjects need to be provided the non-exploitative situation. Moreover, the participants should obtain the fa ir distribution of the costs and benefits so that they could be encouraged for the future research. By analysing the Nuremberg code, it can be assessed that the volunteer permission of any human subjects is needed for involving him into clinical trial process. Likewise, in the human resource management system, the manager needs to accumulate the feedback and suggestions before implementing a process in to the business. On the other hand, the experiment needs to be benefited t the employees. On the other hand, the declaration of Helsinki indicates the ethical approaches for the medical community. According to the declaration of Helsinki, the physicians should be responsible for the protection of health of the patient. Moreover, the physicians need to provide a safeguard to the patients. Similarly, the human resource management team needs to safeguard the employees in the difficult situation. With the involvement of the scientific training and development session, the manager could easily enhance the workability skills of the employees. According to Brakewood Poldrack (2013), the Be lmont report draws the ethical principal for utilising the human subject to investigate. It focuses on three fundamentals including respect for the person, beneficence and justice. Likewise, these fundamentals are also applicable for the human resource team, as these rules could facilitate them in providing respects to the employees. Consequently, these rules can improve the productivity in an effective manner. Role of Human Research Ethics Committees: The human research ethics committee plays an integral role and responsibility in the Australian system for identifying the misunderstanding of the research concerning the humans. The human research ethics committee accurately reviews the research proposals, which involves the human subjects for ensuring the fact that the participants are ethically acceptable and in accordance with the pertinent standard and guideline (Bell, 2014). More than 200 HRECs have been regulating the particular process in Australia. However, other countries also follow this kind of similar system. The national statement focuses on the participants rather analysing on the subjects. According to the national statement, the values need to be set out for the research process. For instances, the investigator needs to have the respect for the human subjects. Moreover, there should be mutual responsibility, trust and ethical equality in the research process. The national statement includes a series of the guideline for any researcher conducting the investigation with human subjects (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2016). Moreover, the particular guideline consists of regulations for the potential research participants. Finally, it can be assessed that the prime role of the human research ethics committee is to identify the rule highlighting the fact that human being needs to be provided adequate respect for upholding the ethical values in an efficient manner. The entire design of the research must be followed by the particular set of guidelines so that the research outcomes facilitate in conducting the future project (National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, 2007). The HREC plays an integral role in the governance of research. Moreover, it provides the approval to the new organization conducting the future project. The human research ethics committee accurately reviews the research proposals, which involves the human subjects for ensuring the fact that the participants are ethically acceptable and in accordance with the pertinent standard and guideline. Main Ethical Issues Surrounding RCTs: Randomized controlled trial (RCTs) indicates a particular type of scientific experiment aiming to reduce bias while testing a new treatment or pharmacological agent. The participants of the trial are allocated to the group that receives the treatment under the investigations and a control group who does not have the treatment. Randomization facilitates the analysis to reduce the biases from the experiments. In the clinical trial process, patients are assigned to the groups receiving different treatments. Hence, the method of assigning the patients into group is called randomization. Over the past few decades, the randomized controlled trials have been increasing, as it enhances the outcome of the clinical trial Buchanan (Wordsworth Schuh, 2013). Moreover, the randomized case trial is more powerful than case reports and observational studies. During the same timeline, the randomized controlled trial was an integral part of the regulatory process, as it facilitates the new therapeutic in gaining access to the drug market. Nowadays, the clinical trials have become strict, as new rules and ethical approaches have been implemented to it for obtaining enhanced outcomes in an efficient manner. On the other hand, these days, the organization conducting the clinical trial, needs to abide by a set of ethics so that the human subjects do not face any physical or mental challenges during the execution process (Chaudhry et al., 2013). Without upholding the ethical requirements, the clinical enterprises are no able to execute the particular process in an effective manner. Besides this, the organizations need to uphold the epistemic standards while conducting the clinical trial. It is a legacy to the old treatment for involving the human subjects into the clinical trial. During the World War II, human experimentation was conducted. However, this legacy continues even after World War II. Consequently, this particular process built up negative impression when some identical ca ses of unethical handling of human subjects. During that timeline, prisoners, the mentally challenged, the poor or the ethnic minorities had been involved in the clinical trial process. These groups of people were hired for conducting the ill-famed Tuskegee syphilis study (Sieber Tolich, 2012). The execution of such practices in democratic and civilized countries indicated that the war slaughter were not the only threats for the human subjects. Hence, the conception of such process had to be reformed entirely so that it could not hurt any human subjects (Lewis, Lipworth Kerridge, 2014). Until the 1970s, the medical investigators had sole authority adjudicating the legitimacy of a study protocol. The protection of the participating patients had to be given by the physician. According to Hippocratic Oath, the doctors should provide the safeguard to the patients while conducting research on human subjects. However, the particular research ethics is completely different from the medic al ethics. On the contrary, these ethics emerged when the episodes of the research delinquency uncovered such assurance in all its meagreness. There are some ethical issues surrounding RCTs. The general problem of the clinical trials can be identified through highlighting the fact that the trial participants often are avoided from the benefits of this particular process. In most of the cases, human subject gaining from the trial results and the trial participants bearing the risk and burden are different. On the other hand, participating in the new clinical trial indicates a high-risk factor compared to having an ordinary clinical check-up. There would be the unexpected effects of the new treatments on the participants. However, these risks are not entirely covered by the legislations. Moreover, the potentially beneficial aspects of the clinical process do not properly counterbalance. The particular trial process not only ended by treating the participants but also produce in-depth medical knowledge. During the mid-century, most of the physicians did not provide adequate information to the participants. Consequently, these participants were placed into the process through the disproportional step. On the contrary, nowadays, the participants are guided by all information about the entire process and the probable outcome of the research. Previously, the physicians deceive the participants by promising a cure for their individual disease that they were dealing with it. Hence, the modern system indicates the fact that the physician must allow the patients to accept the entire process of conducting the particular process. The most important ethical consideration of modern biomedical, clinical trial is that the informed permission is now an integral condition for both research and therapy. According to the modern conception, the prime consent of therapy or research protocol includes three basic features for validating the process in an effective manner. These features are such as the process must be voluntarily expressed, it should be the expression of the proficient subject, and the human subject must have adequate information about the particular process (Turner et al., 2012). However, the physicians often face challenges to identify what level of adequate information is needed to be valid for the particular clinical trial process. Without providing the adequate information on the risks and benefits of the treatment to the patients, physicians may not obtain the approval for the continuation of the process. The participants may undergo the process of blinding and randomization for understanding that the research is voluntary (Hebden, Chey Allmanà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ Farinelli, 2012). It indicates the unjustified to the participants, as they are unable to obtain the benefits out of the process. The patients are required to have the in-depth understanding of the diagnostic or the therapeutic process. Moreover, they should have the adequate knowledge on the risks and benefits of the particular process. In the modern medical research process, the prime issues indicate the fact that the aim of the research does not directly benefit the research participants. However, the patients may receive the therapeutic benefits due to the engagement into the clinical trial process. Sometimes the personal expectations of the patients and investigators may play an integral role in the progression of the process. Consequently, the scientific test of new intervention often requires the patients to receive the pla cebo. Although the placebo lacks the active role of the experimental treatment, it is identical with it. The prime issue for using the placebo is that the physicians often face challenges to make them believe that the placebo plays an integral role in the treatment process. Randomization and blinding are both epistemic devices needed in the clinical trial process for ruling out the most palpable perturbations of the trial outcomes due to the interference from the researcher of the participants (Jenkins et al., 2013). Hence, it can be assessed that the particular process includes distinctive issues highlighted in the above discussion. By analysing the above discussion, it can be assessed that the clinical trials have become increasingly complex for evaluating the clinical research progress. The ethical consideration needs to be abreast of new changes for providing adequate guidance for the medical research in the future. There are several advantages of RCTs. The RCTs facilitate in el iminating the bias to assign the treatment properly. Moreover, it contributes in masking of the identity of treatments from the investigators, participants and assessors. References: Adams, D. P., Miles, T. P. (2013). The application of Belmont Report principles to policy development.Journal of gerontological nursing,39(12), 16-21. Bell, J. (2014).Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Brakewood, B., Poldrack, R. A. (2013). The ethics of secondary data analysis: considering the application of Belmont principles to the sharing of neuroimaging data.Neuroimage,82, 671-676. Buchanan, J., Wordsworth, S., Schuh, A. (2013). Issues surrounding the health economic evaluation of genomic technologies.Pharmacogenomics,14(15), 1833-1847. Chaudhry, S. H., Brehaut, J. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Weijer, C., Boruch, R., Donner, A., ... Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: International survey of investigators.Clinical Trials,10(2), 257-268. Dhai, A. (2014). The research ethics evolution: From Nuremberg to Helsinki.SAMJ: South African Medical Journal,104(3), 178-180. Hebden, L., Chey, T., Allmanà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ Farinelli, M. (2012). Lifestyle intervention for preventing weight gain in young adults: a systematic review and metaà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ analysis of RCTs.Obesity Reviews,13(8), 692-710. Jenkins, V., Farewell, V., Farewell, D., Darmanin, J., Wagstaff, J., Langridge, C., Fallowfield, L. (2013). Drivers and barriers to patient participation in RCTs.British journal of cancer,108(7), 1402-1407. Lewis, J., Lipworth, W., Kerridge, I. (2014). Ethics, evidence and economics in the pursuit of personalized medicine.Journal of personalized medicine,4(2), 137-146. Millum, J., Wendler, D., Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Helsinki: progress but many remaining challenges.Jama,310(20), 2143-2144. Monroe, T. B., Herr, K. A., Mion, L. C., Cowan, R. L. (2013). Ethical and legal issues in pain research in cognitively impaired older adults.International journal of nursing studies,50(9), 1283-1287. National Health and Medical Research Council. (2016) Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) |.Nhmrc.gov.au. Retrieved 20 September 2016, from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/health-ethics/human-research-ethics-committees-hrecs National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) - Updated May 2015 | National Health and Medical Research Council. (2015).Nhmrc.gov.au. Retrieved 20 September 2016, from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72 Sieber, J. E., Tolich, M. B. (2012).Planning ethically responsible research(Vol. 31). Sage Publications. Turner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Weeks, L., Peters, J., Kober, T., ... Moher, D. (2012). Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.The Cochrane Library. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.Jama,310(20), 2191.